Document begins
Critical Path to 2 July 2026 — Acquisition Pursuit
Status: INTERNAL working plan. Today: 24 June 2026. EOI closes: 2 July 2026, 16:00 (8 days). Community pledge period closes: 1 July 2026. Decision in force: the working group is pursuing acquisition via the philanthropic-deposit / exclusivity mechanism set out in the (unpublished) draft Funding Strategy.
The one-paragraph version
You cannot raise $3.15M–$3.7M in 8 days, and you cannot win the open EOI outright. The 8-day goal is position, not capital: get a “yes, and here’s how” from (1) the lawyer (is the deposit/exclusivity mechanism viable, and what’s the safe floor), (2) a donor (is there appetite for a returnable deposit), and (3) the agent/vendor (will they entertain exclusivity), and — as a fail-safe backstop — lodge a conditional EOI before the deadline so the door stays open even if the ambitious path doesn’t land in time.
The master gate
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ LEGAL ADVICE (#19, Topic G) │ ← send TODAY
│ G20: minimum safe step │
└──────────────┬──────────────┘
┌─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
Donor approach (#83) Agent approach Conditional EOI
returnable deposit exclusivity (safe-floor backstop)
│ │ │
└─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘
▼
Exclusivity window won → Phase 2 real raise
OR EOI keeps us in the process
Almost nothing external is safe to do until the lawyer answers Topic G (at least G19 “what we may say” + G20 “minimum safe step”). That is why sending the lawyer brief today, flagged urgent, is action #1.
Phase 0 — Unblock (24–26 June) · human-led, inputs prepared
| # | Action | Owner | Status | Prepared input |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | Send lawyer brief (now incl. Topic G + 2 July sub-request) — request expedited/preliminary guidance | Legal seat / steering lead | ☐ | lawyer brief draft ✅ ready |
| 0.2 | Engage accountant on dual-entity + returns + donor/deposit treatment | Finance seat | ☐ | accountant brief ✅ ready |
| 0.3 | Sound out donor appetite for a returnable deposit | Steering lead + agent-side liaison | ☐ | donor approach pack ✅ + supporters material |
| 0.4 | Decide contracting vehicle question for the lawyer (interim assoc. vs forming co-op vs solicitor trust) | Steering | ☐ | lawyer Topic E/G |
Phase 1 — Position (26 June – 2 July) · gated on Phase 0 advice
| # | Action | Owner | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Refresh pledge/EOI figures from live data | Comms/data | — | ☐ |
| 1.2 | Finalise agent letter (a stronger and a fallback variant were drafted) | Steering lead + legal review | 0.1 (G19/G20) | ☐ draft ready |
| 1.3 | If donor appetite confirmed → agent-side liaison raises exclusivity with agent/vendor | Agent-side liaison | 0.1, 0.3 | ☐ |
| 1.4 | Stand up interim entity if lawyer advises it’s needed to contract/hold deposit | Steering + lawyer | 0.1 | ☐ |
| 1.5 | Backstop: lodge conditional EOI before 2 July 16:00 regardless | Steering lead | 0.1 (G20) | ☐ ⚠️ hard deadline |
Phase 2 — Convert (post-2 July, only if exclusivity/engagement won)
Real capital-stack assembly · legally-gated pledge conversion · independent valuation · building-condition + heritage-works assessment · structure registration · grant applications (Tas Community Fund closes 21 Aug). See the capital-stack model and the feasibility study §12 Stage-2 work plan. Scaffolds can be prepped now (issue #85 pledge capture, grant prep) but collect no binding capital until legal sign-off.
Hard dependencies & risks (the things that can sink the 8-day plan)
- R1 — Lawyer can’t turn it around in time. Mitigation: G20 explicitly asks for a preliminary “safe floor” by email/call; the conditional-EOI backstop (1.5) needs only that.
- R2 — No donor appetite by the deadline. Mitigation: fall back to the fallback-variant EOI; the exclusivity play can still be pursued after 2 July if the EOI keeps the door open.
- R3 — Vendor won’t entertain exclusivity (wants the EOI to run its course for all DD-invested bidders — the Funding Strategy itself flags this). Mitigation: fallback variant; position for the post-EOI scenario if the sale doesn’t complete.
- R4 — Two unregistered creditor caveats on the title complicate any deposit/contract. Mitigation: lawyer Topic F + G16; do not place a deposit without the returnability protections (G17).
- R5 — Overstatement. Any external doc claiming secured funding / willing vendor / a return → guardrail breach. Mitigation: every external artifact is lawyer-reviewed and sign-off-gated.
What stays true regardless (guardrails)
Public posture remains Stage 1 “we’re asking, not announcing.” No fixed returns, no guaranteed dividends, no repayment promises, no owner-willingness claims, no “property secured.” Pledges = intent. All money asks gated on legal/tax confirmation.
What happened next, for the record: an offer was made and was unsuccessful. On 13 August 2026 the working group told the community that the property was under contract to another party. Which of R1–R5 (if any single one) accounts for that outcome is not recorded in this document and is not asserted here.