Archive · Tranche 1

Critical path — eight days to the EOI deadline

The sprint plan written with eight days left on the clock. The dependency graph, the phase gates and the five ways it could fail — with the negotiating posture and the people taken out.

Original title
Critical Path to 2 July 2026 — Acquisition Pursuit
Original date
24 June 2026
Project phase
Acquisition sprint (Stage 1, final fortnight)
Purpose at the time
Sequence the last eight days before the vendor's expression-of-interest deadline so that the working group ended the week with a position, not just hope — and lodged a fail-safe EOI regardless.
Status at the time
Internal working plan, decision in force. Written the day the sprint started; not revised afterwards.
Source provenance
Derived from internal/acquisition_sprint/critical_path.md (private working corpus; unpublished, unchanged). Companion documents it references — the lawyer brief, accountant brief, donor approach pack, agent letter drafts and capital-stack model — are not published.
Publication treatment
Derived
Derived / prepared by
Claude (Fable 5) with Adrian Wedd, 18 August 2026
Prepared
2026-08-18
Human review
Adrian Wedd — publication review completed 19 August 2026
Published
2026-08-19
What was changed for publication
  • Every named person is replaced by their role (steering lead, legal seat, finance seat, agent-side liaison). The original assigned actions to individuals partly on the basis of personal relationships; those assignments are the private part.
  • The mechanism the plan was built around — a returnable, philanthropically-funded deposit to buy a short exclusivity window — is kept, because the whole clock and dependency graph only make sense with it. What is removed is the negotiating posture: which of two agent-letter variants to send, the ordering of asks to a prospective donor, and the specific offer positions. None of it was ever put to the vendor.
  • The two caveat dealing numbers on the title, and the caveators' names, are withheld; the caveats are still described by their factual status — two *unregistered* creditor caveats. That status is the substance of the risk (an unregistered caveat still has to be resolved before a transfer can register), so generalising it away would have misstated the record. Only the identifiers are removed.
  • GitHub issue numbers are kept where they were; the issues they point at are in a private repository.
  • The one-paragraph version, the master gate, the phase tables, the five risks and the closing guardrails are otherwise as written — including the flat opening admission that the money could not be raised in time.

Document begins

Critical Path to 2 July 2026 — Acquisition Pursuit

Status: INTERNAL working plan. Today: 24 June 2026. EOI closes: 2 July 2026, 16:00 (8 days). Community pledge period closes: 1 July 2026. Decision in force: the working group is pursuing acquisition via the philanthropic-deposit / exclusivity mechanism set out in the (unpublished) draft Funding Strategy.


The one-paragraph version

You cannot raise $3.15M–$3.7M in 8 days, and you cannot win the open EOI outright. The 8-day goal is position, not capital: get a “yes, and here’s how” from (1) the lawyer (is the deposit/exclusivity mechanism viable, and what’s the safe floor), (2) a donor (is there appetite for a returnable deposit), and (3) the agent/vendor (will they entertain exclusivity), and — as a fail-safe backstop — lodge a conditional EOI before the deadline so the door stays open even if the ambitious path doesn’t land in time.

The master gate

                 ┌─────────────────────────────┐
                 │  LEGAL ADVICE (#19, Topic G) │  ← send TODAY
                 │  G20: minimum safe step      │
                 └──────────────┬──────────────┘
          ┌─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┐
          ▼                     ▼                     ▼
   Donor approach (#83)   Agent approach         Conditional EOI
   returnable deposit     exclusivity            (safe-floor backstop)
          │                     │                     │
          └─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘
                                ▼
              Exclusivity window won  →  Phase 2 real raise
              OR EOI keeps us in the process

Almost nothing external is safe to do until the lawyer answers Topic G (at least G19 “what we may say” + G20 “minimum safe step”). That is why sending the lawyer brief today, flagged urgent, is action #1.


Phase 0 — Unblock (24–26 June) · human-led, inputs prepared

#ActionOwnerStatusPrepared input
0.1Send lawyer brief (now incl. Topic G + 2 July sub-request) — request expedited/preliminary guidanceLegal seat / steering leadlawyer brief draft ✅ ready
0.2Engage accountant on dual-entity + returns + donor/deposit treatmentFinance seataccountant brief ✅ ready
0.3Sound out donor appetite for a returnable depositSteering lead + agent-side liaisondonor approach pack ✅ + supporters material
0.4Decide contracting vehicle question for the lawyer (interim assoc. vs forming co-op vs solicitor trust)Steeringlawyer Topic E/G

Phase 1 — Position (26 June – 2 July) · gated on Phase 0 advice

#ActionOwnerDepends onStatus
1.1Refresh pledge/EOI figures from live dataComms/data
1.2Finalise agent letter (a stronger and a fallback variant were drafted)Steering lead + legal review0.1 (G19/G20)☐ draft ready
1.3If donor appetite confirmed → agent-side liaison raises exclusivity with agent/vendorAgent-side liaison0.1, 0.3
1.4Stand up interim entity if lawyer advises it’s needed to contract/hold depositSteering + lawyer0.1
1.5Backstop: lodge conditional EOI before 2 July 16:00 regardlessSteering lead0.1 (G20)☐ ⚠️ hard deadline

Phase 2 — Convert (post-2 July, only if exclusivity/engagement won)

Real capital-stack assembly · legally-gated pledge conversion · independent valuation · building-condition + heritage-works assessment · structure registration · grant applications (Tas Community Fund closes 21 Aug). See the capital-stack model and the feasibility study §12 Stage-2 work plan. Scaffolds can be prepped now (issue #85 pledge capture, grant prep) but collect no binding capital until legal sign-off.


Hard dependencies & risks (the things that can sink the 8-day plan)

  • R1 — Lawyer can’t turn it around in time. Mitigation: G20 explicitly asks for a preliminary “safe floor” by email/call; the conditional-EOI backstop (1.5) needs only that.
  • R2 — No donor appetite by the deadline. Mitigation: fall back to the fallback-variant EOI; the exclusivity play can still be pursued after 2 July if the EOI keeps the door open.
  • R3 — Vendor won’t entertain exclusivity (wants the EOI to run its course for all DD-invested bidders — the Funding Strategy itself flags this). Mitigation: fallback variant; position for the post-EOI scenario if the sale doesn’t complete.
  • R4 — Two unregistered creditor caveats on the title complicate any deposit/contract. Mitigation: lawyer Topic F + G16; do not place a deposit without the returnability protections (G17).
  • R5 — Overstatement. Any external doc claiming secured funding / willing vendor / a return → guardrail breach. Mitigation: every external artifact is lawyer-reviewed and sign-off-gated.

What stays true regardless (guardrails)

Public posture remains Stage 1 “we’re asking, not announcing.” No fixed returns, no guaranteed dividends, no repayment promises, no owner-willingness claims, no “property secured.” Pledges = intent. All money asks gated on legal/tax confirmation.

What happened next, for the record: an offer was made and was unsuccessful. On 13 August 2026 the working group told the community that the property was under contract to another party. Which of R1–R5 (if any single one) accounts for that outcome is not recorded in this document and is not asserted here.

End of document ← Back to the archive