Campaign document vault · historical
The paper trail, in public.
These are the drafts, briefings, and reports produced during the Bottom Pub acquisition campaign, which concluded on 13 August 2026 after the working group’s offer was unsuccessful and the property went under contract. They are kept unedited for the record and describe the position at the time, not the current one. Nothing here is being added to.
For where things stand now, see Status. For the working corpus behind the campaign, see the campaign archive.
A single sourced page mapping every load-bearing issue from the original proposal to its current treatment, severity tier, and the briefing carrying the detail. Start here if you only read one document.
ArchivedWhy we do not, and will not, offer fixed dividends or first-mortgage positions to community members at this stage. Plain-language explainer.
ArchivedNatural Person rule under the Tasmanian Liquor Licensing Act 1990; Distributing vs Non-Distributing co-op trade-off; what a Disclosure Statement is and when it’s required.
ArchivedWhat the Tasmanian Heritage Register listing (Place ID 3472) means in legal terms, what triggers Heritage Council approval, and what the Building Code and Food Standard 3.2.3 add for any change-of-use feasibility work.
ArchivedThe seven ICA principles, why investor-reserved board seats and complex sociocracy don't fit Australian co-op law, and the simple board-and-publican structure the rework proposes for Stage 1.
ArchivedWhat an actual Stage-2 feasibility study would scope: workstreams, consultants needed, recurring compliance and insurance costs the original proposal didn't carry, and the sensitivity tests a credible go/no-go recommendation must survive.
ArchivedFunding-source menu for a community-owned pub: grants, social finance, equity crowdfunding, member shares, UK CBS precedents, and the CNL Disclosure Statement boundary between exploring and offering. Not a fundraising plan.
ArchivedPublic ledger of every case study cited in earlier drafts, with verification status and the reason any have been removed from this page.
ArchivedWorking register of Australian community-owned and co-operative pub/hotel precedents: verified analogues, historical cases, adjacent co-ops, and candidates needing stronger source work.
ArchivedIncome tax, GST, ACNC charity pathway, FBT, payroll tax, stamp duty, land tax, and the AASB 132 member-share equity vs debt classification for a Tasmanian community co-operative pub.
ArchivedHuon Valley LPS (parcel zone still being confirmed against PlanBuild Tasmania), the DA process via PlanBuild Tasmania, Heritage Council discretionary permit, NCC change-of-use, acoustic management, and food premises registration for a community pub.
ArchivedSelected LISTmap layers for the site: cadastre, planning zones and overlays, heritage, servicing, building footprints, and screening results from flood and soil layers.
ArchivedCo-op-aware lenders, SEFA, Bendigo Community Bank, the CSF structural incompatibility with CNL co-operatives, Co-operative Capital Units, and Australian and UK community-pub precedents.
ArchivedContradictions between the operating model's governance design and Australian co-operative law principles.
ArchivedThe official heritage listing for the Commercial Hotel, including statement of significance and protected fabric.
External · liveThe version of this page in print-ready form, with the research notes and disclosures included. Was contingent on the concluded acquisition reaching an export-worthy stage; never exported.
Never exportedDraft v1.1 of the Cygnet Community Co-operative’s rules (share capital, member loans, asset lock) and the founding statements that sit alongside them. Whether the co-op is distributing or non-distributing is still an open legal choice — see the legal and licensing briefing. Circulated for community feedback — not adopted, not financial advice.
Draft · for reviewPlain answers to the questions we hear most — what ownership could mean, what shares and loans are, and what a non-distributing co-op can and can’t do.
ArchivedIndependent analysis of whether the venue could plausibly trade as a community-owned pub. Was contingent on the concluded acquisition reaching this stage; it did not, and the pub is now under contract to another buyer. Whether a study like this happens for any future site is a decision for the incoming board, not this archive.
Never reachedRequired under Co-operatives National Law only if a distributing co-op is later proposed and shares are offered. Was contingent on the concluded acquisition reaching this stage; it did not. Would be reviewed by qualified counsel before any release, should a future proposal require one.
Never reachedItems marked “Archived” link to the document as it stood when the campaign concluded. The one item marked “External · live” points to a source maintained outside this project, not a campaign snapshot. Draft and pending items are preserved here so the community can see what was in flight at the time, not so they can be cited as final.
Read something that makes you curious? The pub purchase is over, but the co-operative forming out of this work is not.